Namami Gange, the Central government’s ambitious project to clean the Ganga, seems to have delivered modest results, with the quality of river water from Rudraparayag in Uttarakhand to Uluberia in West Bengal having improved between 2014 and 2019, according to Jal Shakti ministry data, but experts say it will take decades before the water becomes fit for human consumption .
The
dissolved oxygen level, or the amount of oxygen available to living aquatic
organisms, has improved at 27 locations and the biochemical oxygen demand
(BOD), the amount of oxygen consumed by bacteria while they decompose organic
matter, and faecal coliform (FC) content, a measure of the suitability of water
for consumption, has improved at 42 and 21 locations, respectively.
The
information was provided by the Jal Shakti ministry in response to a query by
Kochi-based RTI applicant, K Govindan Nampoothiry. The ministry has provided
the annual average of Ganga water quality on these three parameters, thereby
discounting seasonal variations.
After coming to power in May 2014, the
National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government the following month launched the
Namami Ganga project with the objectives of reducing river pollution, and
promoting its conservation and rejuvenation.
Jal Shakti
ministry data shows that in past six years, the water quality of the river on
these three parameters has improved marginally at most locations and at this
pace, the authorities would take decades to make the river’s water fit for
human consumption, experts said.
“The progress so far has been slow. In six
years, if Ganga’s water quality has improved by just 10-15%, it would take
decades to clean the Ganga,” said BD Joshi, founder of the Indian Academy of
Environmental Sciences, who has worked on the river for more than four decades.
The Central
government had initially fixed 2019 as the deadline to clean the river, but
extended it to 2022 as the Namami Ganga Project (NGP) took off slowly. As of
August 1, only 29% of the 154 sewage projects taken up had been completed. For
the projects, the ministry has allocated 23,120 crore, according to government documents.
A ministry official privy to the
information about Namami Ganga said sewerage infrastructure projects were
coming up in eight states — Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, West
Bengal, Haryana, Delhi and Himachal Pradesh — through which the 2,525-km river
flows. The 97 towns located on the main stem of the Ganga generate 2,953
million litres a day (MLD) of sewage. The available treatment capacity is only
1,794 MLD.
The RTI
reply showed the maximum improvement in Ganga water quality has taken place in
the hills of Uttarakhand, primarily due to efforts made to contain the flow of
human and animal sewage. Another reason for this could be that unlike in the
plains, the flow of industrial waste in the hill is much less.
“We have minimized flow of human sewage by
building sewage treatment plants in towns and toilets for all those living
close to river Ganga. Work is on for zero sewage into river Ganga in the
state,” said Uttarakhand environment minister Harak Singh Rawat.
The reply showed that as the river flows
into the pilgrim centre of Haridwar in Uttarakhand, the water quality
deteriorated and further fell in the downstream in the industrial town of
Kanpur, where industrial waste still flows into the river.
The water
quality between Haridwar and Kanpur improved between 2014 and 2019 by 8-10%.
The water quality was slightly better in
Chapra and Patna because of the fresh flow of water from Ganga tributaries in
Bihar such as Kosi and Gandak. But it again fell as the river entered West
Bengal. The water quality in Bihar and West Bengal has improved by almost 30%
between 2014 and 2019.
Himanshu Thakkar, coordinator of the South
Asia Network of Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP), said a bigger issue than
improvement in water quality is the flow of the river.
“If the flow of the river improves in all
seasons, the water quality will improve significantly. But the reality is that
the flow is decreasing and it will have huge implications for people living in
the Ganga river basin even if water quality improves,” he said.




0 Comments